[XML-SIG] WSDL library ?
Rich Salz wrote:
>> > I will be extremely disappointed if WSDL 1.1 is made SOAP only.
>> Don't worry, I expect to lose that battle. (01)
Good :-) I would at least want XML-RPC bindings in there too (simply
because it's so much easier to implement and get right). (02)
> > WSDL's biggest problem, IMO, is that people feel it is not a language
>> > that should be authored by hand.
>> What's preventing it? In my view, it's the cut/paste repetition you
>> have to keep doing. The WG is starting to collect requirements, I'll
>> forward anything you can suggest. (03)
Isn't the <import ...> tag in WSDL intended to prevent copy&paste
(by hand) ? (04)
CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH
Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/
Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ (05)