[XML-SIG] WSDL library ?
Paul Prescod <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: (01)
> > BTW, IIOP is an unfair target. Should I attack SOAP 0.9?
>> > What do you think about GIOP, then?
>> I thought IIOP was the binding of GIOP for the Internet. It would seem
>> to be more analogous to SOAP than GIOP which is not "general". (02)
All true. And even though GIOP (and thus IIOP) has its subtleties, I
don't think it is correct to call it a "crappy protocol". It is very
easy to implement, quite well specified (the message format is defined
in IDL itself), and, compared to any XML RPC scheme, super-efficient. (03)