[XML-SIG] WSDL library ?
Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> Fits the 80%/20% rule perfectly. (01)
Even so, XML-RPC really is a hack. It doesn't support Unicode, has a
silly definition of float, is needlessly bloated (to the point of
obfuscation) , has no way of inlining XML elements etc. You could have
something just as easy to use that wasn't a hack. e.g. (02)
Here's one I prefer: (03)
> ... Less than 5 pages and easy to implement
>> reliably. For the people in that 80% pool it's simply the best solution.
>> The only problem is being able to cache calls without side-effects, but
>> it's a scaling issue, and that minimal addition could probably be
>> standardized on top the core (like HTTP/1.1 vs HTTP/1.0 initial goal). (05)
If you want to scale I'd say you shouldn't use RPC...that's another
emerging concensus... Here's my contribution to it: (06)
Paul Prescod (08)