[XML-SIG] WSDL library ?
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:31:29PM -0700, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
>> > > I will be extremely disappointed if WSDL 1.1 is made SOAP only.
>> > Don't worry, I expect to lose that battle.
>> It looks as if you should have made it to SPAM10 for the Web services panel.
>> You would have been the only one with any decent amount of good things to say
>> about SOAP ;-)
>> Pretty scary when I'd be more comfortable pointing people to a hack like
>> XML-RPC than I would be pointing people to SOAP. (01)
Fits the 80%/20% rule perfectly. Less than 5 pages and easy to implement
reliably. For the people in that 80% pool it's simply the best solution.
The only problem is being able to cache calls without side-effects, but
it's a scaling issue, and that minimal addition could probably be
standardized on top the core (like HTTP/1.1 vs HTTP/1.0 initial goal). (02)
> [ Wow. And I tried to make a conscious effort not to rant ;-) ] (03)
ranting ? nahhh (04)
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
firstname.lastname@example.org | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ (06)